Transmitted Drug Resistance and HIV Diversity Among Adolescents Newly Diagnosed With HIV in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Virologic characterization of newly HIV-diagnosed adolescents could help to improve their specific needs. The objective was to describe the transmitted drug resistance mutations (TDR) and its transmission by clusters in this population in Spain. METHODS: TDR to retrotranscriptase and protease inhibitors included in the WHO TDR list 2009 implemented in the Calibrated Population Resistance tool v8.0 (Stanford) were studied in HIV pol sequences from all HIV-diagnosed adolescents (12-19-year-old) enrolled during 2004-2019 period in the Spanish pediatric and adult (CoRISpe-CoRIS) cohorts. The found TDR were compared with the provided by the Stanford algorithm v9.0 2021. HIV-1 variants and transmission clusters were also studied. RESULTS: Among 410 HIV-1 adolescents diagnosed, 141 (34.4%) had available ART-naive sequences. They were mostly male (81.6%), Spanish (55.3%) and with behavioral risk (92.2%), mainly male-to-male sexual contact (63.1%). TDR prevalence was significantly higher by Stanford versus WHO list (18.4% vs. 7.1%; P = 0.004). The most prevalent TDR by the WHO list was K103N (3.6%) and by Stanford E138A (6.6%), both at retrotranscriptase. E138A, related to rilpivirine/etravirine resistance, was absent in the WHO list. One in 4 adolescents carried HIV-1 non-B variants. We described 5 transmission clusters, and 2 carried TDR mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a high TDR prevalence in adolescents with a new HIV diagnosis in Spain, similar to adults, 2 active TDR transmission clusters, and the need for the WHO TDR list update. These findings could have implications for the options of the recently available rilpivirine-related long-acting treatment and in first-line regimen election.

Prevalence of M184V and K65R in proviral DNA from PBMCs in HIV-infected youths with lamivudine/emtricitabine exposure.

OBJECTIVES: We analysed the prevalence of M184V/I and/or K65R/E/N mutations archived in proviral DNA (pDNA) in youths with perinatal HIV, virological control and who previously carried these resistance mutations in historic plasma samples. METHODS: We included vertically HIV-infected youths/young adults aged ≥10 years in the Madrid Cohort of HIV-1 Infected Children and Adolescents, exposed to lamivudine and/or emtricitabine, with M184V/I and/or K65R/E/N in historic plasma samples, on antiretroviral therapy (ART), virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL), and with available PBMCs in the Spanish HIV BioBank. Genomic DNA was extracted from PBMCs and HIV-1 RT gene was amplified and sequenced for resistance testing by Stanford HIV Resistance tool. RESULTS: Among the 225 patients under follow-up in the study cohort, 13 (5.8%) met selection criteria, and RT sequences were recovered in 12 (92.3%) of them. All but one were Spaniards, carrying subtype B, with a median age at PBMCs sampling of 21.3 years (IQR: 15.6-23.1) with 4 years (IQR 2.1-6.5) of suppressed viral load (VL). Nine (75%) youths did not present M184V/I in pDNA after at least 1 year of viral suppression. In December 2019, the remaining three subjects carrying M184V/I in pDNA maintained suppressed viraemia, and two still used emtricitabine in ART. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of resistance mutations to lamivudine and emtricitabine in pDNA in a cohort of youths perinatally infected with HIV who remain with undetectable VL, previously lamivudine and/or emtricitabine experienced, was infrequent. Our results indicate that ART including lamivudine or emtricitabine may also be safe and successful in youths with perinatal HIV with previous experience of and resistances to these drugs detected in plasma.

Virological outcome among HIV infected patients transferred from pediatric care to adult units in Madrid, Spain (1997-2017).

The aim of this transversal study was to describe the virological and immunological features of HIV-infected youths transferred from pediatric to adult care units since 1997 vs. the non-transferred patients from the Madrid Cohort of HIV-infected children and adolescents in Spain. We included 106 non-transferred and 184 transferred patients under clinical follow-up in 17 public hospitals in Madrid by the end of December 2017. Virological and immunological outcomes were compared in transferred vs. non-transferred patients. ART drug resistance mutations and HIV-variants were analyzed in all subjects with available resistance pol genotypes and/or genotypic resistance profiles. Among the study cohort, 133 (72.3%) of 184 transferred and 75 (70.7%) of 106 non-transferred patients had available resistance genotypes. Most (88.9%) of transferred had ART experience at sampling. A third (33.3%) had had a triple-class experience. Acquired drug resistance (ADR) prevalence was significantly higher in pretreated transferred than non-transferred patients (71.8% vs. 44%; p = 0.0009), mainly to NRTI (72.8% vs. 31.1%; p < 0.0001) and PI (29.1% vs. 12%; p = 0.0262). HIV-1 non-B variants were less frequent in transferred vs. non-transferred (6.9% vs. 32%; p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the frequent resistant genotypes found in transferred youths justifies the reinforcement of HIV resistance monitoring after the transition to avoid future therapeutic failures.